Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Orzhov Pixie | rubyxillia | 7-1 | None |
Esper Pixie | pablopinach | 9-5 | None |
Mono Black Demons | strongmind | 6-1 | None |
Mono Black Demons | strongmind | 6-2 | None |
Dimir Midrange | riccardo casu | 7-7 | None |
Mono Black Demons | giordano distefano | 7-7 | None |
Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Gruul Leyline , Mono Black Demons , Orzhov Pixie , Rakdos Aggro
Rankle, Master of Pranks ranks #3715 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 72%).
Black average: 49.9%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Rankle, Master of Pranks is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 3.96 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.9%. Rankle, Master of Pranks has a win rate of 58.8%, making it 22.8% better than other 4-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eliminate | Instant | 6 | 66.7% | 2 |
Agonizing Remorse | Sorcery | 7 | 65.8% | 1 |
Zareth San, the Trickster | Legendary Creature — Merfolk Rogue | 5 | 62.9% | 1 |
Thieves' Guild Enforcer | Creature — Human Rogue | 5 | 62.9% | 1 |
Bloodchief's Thirst | Sorcery | 8 | 62.1% | 2 |
Nighthawk Scavenger | Creature — Vampire Rogue | 9 | 58.9% | 2 |
Heartless Act | Instant | 15 | 58.2% | 2 |
Kalitas, Traitor of Ghet | Legendary Creature — Vampire Warrior | 5 | 57.1% | 1 |
Spawn of Mayhem | Creature — Demon | 6 | 54.5% | 0 |
Soaring Thought-Thief | Creature — Human Rogue | 6 | 52.4% | 1 |
Cards that perform better with Rankle, Master of Pranks than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eliminate | Instant | 2 | 5 | 79.4% | 61.6% | +17.8% |
Aethersphere Harvester | Artifact — Vehicle | 3 | 6 | 67.9% | 55.1% | +12.7% |
Agonizing Remorse | Sorcery | 2 | 7 | 74.0% | 63.6% | +10.4% |
Nighthawk Scavenger | Creature — Vampire Rogue | 3 | 7 | 70.0% | 60.5% | +9.5% |
Merfolk Windrobber | Creature — Merfolk Rogue | 1 | 5 | 63.0% | 55.1% | +7.9% |
Soaring Thought-Thief | Creature — Human Rogue | 2 | 5 | 63.0% | 55.6% | +7.3% |
Bloodsoaked Champion | Creature — Human Warrior | 1 | 6 | 64.3% | 57.6% | +6.7% |
Scrapheap Scrounger | Artifact Creature — Construct | 2 | 9 | 65.3% | 59.2% | +6.1% |
Thoughtseize | Sorcery | 1 | 13 | 61.6% | 56.2% | +5.5% |
Heartless Act | Instant | 2 | 14 | 64.7% | 59.3% | +5.3% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Mono Black Demons | 13 | 6.8% | 46.0% |
Dimir Midrange | 8 | 0.3% | 40.5% |
Orzhov Pixie | 3 | 1.2% | 42.5% |
Esper Pixie | 2 | 0.1% | 57.1% |
Gruul Leyline | 2 | 0.8% | 50.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.